Execution as a Decree under Section 36

Under Section 36(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, once the time for making an application to set aside an arbitral award under Section 34 has expired, or when such an application has been dismissed, the award becomes enforceable in the same manner as if it were a decree of the civil court.

Execution proceedings in the Delhi High Court are governed by Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, empowering the executing court to order attachment of bank accounts, immovable assets, and corporate receivables of the judgment debtor.

Abolition of the Automatic Stay Paradigm

Prior to the 2015 amendment, filing a Section 34 application automatically stayed the enforcement of the arbitral award. The 2015 amendment abolished this automatic stay rule, as reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. v. Union of India (2020) 17 SCC 324.

Under Section 36(2) and (3), the award debtor must file a separate application for grant of stay. The court exercises discretion similar to Order XLI Rule 5 CPC, routinely directing deposit of 50% to 100% of the awarded amount as a condition for interim stay.

The 2021 Fraud Exception & Delhi High Court Practice

The 2021 amendment added a proviso to Section 36(3) directing an unconditional stay where the court is satisfied that a prima facie case is made out that the arbitration agreement or the award was induced or effected by fraud or corruption.

Delhi High Court Commercial Division maintains an expedited registry for enforcement petitions, ensuring that valid arbitral awards are translated into commercial recovery without unnecessary execution delays.

Let’s Discuss Your Legal Matter

For consultations and legal queries, feel free to get in touch.

Contact Now